
Solving Tornadoes: Woke Meteorology
By James McGinn

Solving Tornadoes: Woke MeteorologySep 15, 2023

Paradigm of Confusion
Paradigm of Confusion

Why Everybody is Confused About Water
Why Everybody is Confused About Water

The Subtle Error That Has Everybody Perplexed About H2O
The Subtle Error That Has Everybody Perplexed About H2O

Why I Am World's Number One Expert On Physics of Water, Storms, and Atmospheric Flow
Why I Am World's Number One Expert On Physics of Water, Storms, and Atmospheric Flow

Comparing Tornadoes to Hurricanes
Comparing Tornadoes to Hurricanes

Water's Hidden Algorithm of Storms
How Solving Tornadoes is able to sidestep the tangled confusion that is the current paradigm on storm theory.

Why Part of Meteorology is Delusional and How Anyone Can Determine This For Themselves
Why Part of Meteorology is Delusional and How Anyone Can Determine This For Themselves

There is No Such Thing as a Science Denier
There is No Such Thing as a Science Denier

Nonsensicality and Other Features of Modern Meteorology
Nonsensicality and Other Features of Modern Meteorology

More on Pollack and Methods of Truth
More on Pollack and Methods of Truth

You Could Have Noticed
You Could Have Noticed

You Have Been Mis-educated on H2O
You Have Been Mis-educated on H2O

When everybody is confused: My thoughts on Gerald Pollack's Water Theory
My thoughts on Gerald Pollack's Water Theory

Secrets of Flow
December 21st 2022

Slipperiness in the Atmosphere
Slipperiness in the Atmosphere

Seven of Seven September 2022
One of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn

Six of Seven September 2022
Six of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn

Five of Seven September 2022
Five of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn

Four of Seven September 2022
Four of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn

Three of Seven September 2022
Three of Seven September 2022
One of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn

Two of Seven September 2022
Two of Seven September 2022 Solving Tornadoes James McGinn

One of Seven September 2022
One of Seven September 2022
Solving Tornadoes
James McGinn

What Do Skeptics Know?
WDSK

Buoyancy Versus Plumbing
BVP

Do Vortices Generate Lightning?

Vortices are the Pressure Relief Valve of the atmosphere
Why meteorology is phoney science.

Heat engine in the Sky
Heat engine in the Sky

Four Thousand Years and a Shop Vacuum
Four Thousand Years and a Shop Vacuum

Reverse Engineering Human Rationality
Reverse Engineering Human Rationality

Proper Role of Water in the Atmosphere
Traditional meteorology tells us that the role of water in the atmosphere is that it provides the energy for flow. This is mistaken. As is explained here, the proper role of water in the atmosphere is as the basis for the structure that focusses the flow to achieve streaming.

Is convection True or False
A simple way to test veracity of convection.

The Momentum of the Jet Stream is Maintained by Vortice Activity
The Momentum of the Jet Stream is Maintained by Vortice Activity

Sympathy to those who are incredulous of the Spinning Nanodroplets of Vortice Plasma
Sympathy to those who are incredulous of the Spinning Nanodroplets of Vortice Plasma
I do understand how people can be incredulous when the first encounter the notion of spinning polymers of H2O on wind shear boundaries

Why and How Meteorology deceives the Public
Meteorology's Blatant Dishonesty is Unknown to the Public

Meteorology's Achilles' Heal
Another thing Meteorology doesn't want the public to realize

Surface Tension on Steroids
Water is the source of the structure of the atmosphere.

Understanding Water is a Prerequisite to Understanding Storms
We have to understand water first. When we do understand water its role in storms will become clear.

Why Water Science is a Goat Rope
Why Water Science is a Goat Road

The Water Taboo
The Water Taboo

Vortice Plasma

No Other Avenue

About My Coming Video
H2O polarity is variable and not constant.

More on Story-telling Ape

Story-telling Ape

The religion that science has become and the realization of vortice plasma

Concensus and Koalas
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=360#p125466
I discovered the empirical shortcomings of meteorology after I discovered them in climatology. My reasoning was very simple. Knowing that the origins of climatology are in meteorology, I reasoned that if AGW is as bad as it appears then meteorology must also have skeletons in its closet. So I did something that nobody has done before, I looked at the convection model of storm theory with scrutiny. I found numerous fatal flaws and I found that meteorologists have long ago established a tradition of ignoring these fatal flaws.
My point is that you/we cannot defeat a conversational science based on empiricism because conversational sciences are based on allegories that appeal to the base sensations of the public. The only way to defeat a conversational science is to reveal it as such to the public. And the best way to reveal it to the public is to start with meteorology since this is the spring from which it sprang (or is it sprung?). The conversational tradition is the problem and its roots are in meteorology, not climatology.

Similarity of a Dam Breach to a Storm
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=360#p125466
I discovered the empirical shortcomings of meteorology after I discovered them in climatology. My reasoning was very simple. Knowing that the origins of climatology are in meteorology, I reasoned that if AGW is as bad as it appears then meteorology must also have skeletons in its closet. So I did something that nobody has done before, I looked at the convection model of storm theory with scrutiny. I found numerous fatal flaws and I found that meteorologists have long ago established a tradition of ignoring these fatal flaws.
My point is that you/we cannot defeat a conversational science based on empiricism because conversational sciences are based on allegories that appeal to the base sensations of the public. The only way to defeat a conversational science is to reveal it as such to the public. And the best way to reveal it to the public is to start with meteorology since this is the spring from which it sprang (or is it sprung?). The conversational tradition is the problem and its roots are in meteorology, not climatology.

Truth Monkeys sucking on the thumb of consensus

Gustiness And The Things That Don't Cause It
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=60#p114924
For example, do you concur with the notion that moist air contains gaseous H2O? Yes? No? Do you dispute my assertion that this notion is nonsense? Yes? No? Undoubtedly we will never know because, like all science pretenders, you are determined to ride the fence, play it safe. And that is too bad. Science isn’t about looking or even being right. It’s about being specific so that if you are wrong you can realize you are wrong when you are wrong. Because realizing you are wrong when you are wrong is the hardest part of any scientific endeavor. More than anything else, science is about defeating your minds desire to take the easy path and just believe.

What is Water's Role in Storms?
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329&start=60#p114924
For example, do you concur with the notion that moist air contains gaseous H2O? Yes? No? Do you dispute my assertion that this notion is nonsense? Yes? No? Undoubtedly we will never know because, like all science pretenders, you are determined to ride the fence, play it safe. And that is too bad. Science isn’t about looking or even being right. It’s about being specific so that if you are wrong you can realize you are wrong when you are wrong. Because realizing you are wrong when you are wrong is the hardest part of any scientific endeavor. More than anything else, science is about defeating your minds desire to take the easy path and just believe.