MY GUARDIAN ANGEL

An example given by Micheal loftin from Reason & Theology YouTube channel, that explains reduced subjective culpability. This example helps me understand experiences in my life that I couldn’t control, and leads me to consider if I was fully subjectively culpable for actions I commited of grave matter. At least there is healing in that sense.

Invincible ignorance - continued

Invincible ignorance

Teaching priests’ the consequences of pedophilia caused upon victims could help with the limitations Bishops have in educating predophiles that their actions are wrong. Bishops limit their influence upon pedophile priests based on their subjective beliefs/assessment of what the pedophile will do in the future if the pedophile were taught by the bishop that pedophilia actions they perform is bad. A priest having reduced culpability & invincible ignorance could be the excuse Bishops give themselves to clear their own conscience if they choose NOT to tell the pedophile that it is wrong because it causes suicide of victims. Police, teachers and lay members of society have to teach the priests of the grave consequence of children committing suicide due to their abuse from the past. Because of the Bishops’ fear that the soul of the priest he is in charge of will go to hell by deliberately continuing the pedophilic action with full knowledge of its grave consequence, namely the suicide of victims, Bishops may not have the option to do catechesis/teaching themselves if they truly believe the pedophile will still formally act against this correction. Pope Francis was right in saying that pedophilia within the Church is caused by lack of catechesis/teaching, but many interpret his ambiguous comments as him referring to laymembers of the church when in fact he most likely is referring to the lack of teaching the pedophile gets with regards to the hierarchy keeping him in invincible ignorance of the knowledge that his actions will cause suicide of his child victims

As a York public school board special interest service provider, I encourage parents to please petition the school principals to welcome our 1-hour/week lunch and after-school workshop series where students can learn from my ‘Cartooning in Film & Video Game’ lesson plan. They’ll make their own superheroes and upload it onto our app that may one day actually save a child from pedophilia.

Save time animating characters by first animating the simple shapes that represent them before focusing on the detail

corrections of my podcast continued

Recording character design and introduction to animation.

Bananas, owls and when doves cry…

Supernatural is not what you think! People in everyday speech when saying the word supernatural speak of it in terms of what we as Catholics have defined as SUPRA-natural. So there is first, natural, then secondly, supranatural & then finally supernatural. The SUPERnatural is only one, that is Divine nature, Creator. The other forms of nature, namely supranatural and natural, consist of what is meant by when we speak of creation, that is, what the Creator created, or in other words, that which need not exist.

Policies that govern society and the church can help reduce culpable/vincible ignorance but it can never remove innocent/invincible ignorance and this is where the lay people both in civil as well as in the church have a permanent role to play so that invincible/innocent ignorance does not remain as an excuse from the hierarchy for the systematic coverup of pedophiles. Even if victims are unintended bad consequences of clerical decisions, the lay people must remove the bad consequences regardless, this is catechism 101 : Do good, avoid evil.

Obedience to the bacon god, the phenomenon god or the supernatural God?

Things you’ll need to know

A sneak peak of the storyline and character concepts for the game

kids should be respected

Invincible ignorance of perpetrator, coupled with victim keeping it bottled up inside of them, make up for an inverted understanding of Christs’ love for children. Let’s not let it happen here!

John Jay report, how perpetrators condition kids using psychologically tactics (ex: Pavlov’s dog theory)

I made a miscalculation in the podcast…sorry, here is the correct one:

0.26% of 798 priests in toronto = 2 pedophile priests (not 3)

So statistically speaking, within the span of 50 years you will have 2 priests that are pedophiles having been transfered to different parishes within the diocese whenever they are rightfully suspected of their crime, but never get jail time although are guilty. If we don’t include these 2, there will also be a 3rd pedophile that gets jail time.

conditioning the psychological freedom of invincibly ignorant people creates the environment/circumstances within the community of the faithful to inadvertently ignore the cry of the children, that is, the poor children being victims of pedophiles now!

Adopting St. Alphonses Legorio’s teaching on invincible ignorance, as finding it a valid pastoral approach to omit teaching a penitent in friendship with God the awareness of an act that they are currently doing as being sinful, due to the assumption that if it is believed that the penitent would become aware that his act is a sin would still do the act and therefore formally mortally sin (because he isn’t ready to follow that rule as of yet due to immaturity in faith as of yet), could be the reason why pedophilia continues to remain systematic within the hierarchy of the Catholic Church. It could be that Bishops don’t find these priest culpable of their pedophilia acts due to the invincible ignorance that it is a sin

In highlighting the text, as seen in the video, I pinpoint the principle teaching that I believe Bishops adopt from St. Alphonsus Liguori to make decisions to council pedophile priests to remain in invincible ignorance that their acts against their victims are not only evil but produce grave evil consequences.

Internal vs External Forum - Making distinctions between the two help us understand that not living up to the sacramental signs of matrimony that are meant to reflect the love of Christ for his Church, does not necessarily mean that a rupture with friendship with God (mortal sin) has occurred.

Also, if I may add, matrimony between one man and one women as a visible sign of our faith in the Trinity as another example of the external forum giving witness to our faith in the Triune God, if unable to be witnessed may not necessarily mean the mentioned couple is in a state of mortal sin.

This distinction between the Internal & External forum is necessary to understand the distribution of priest from one parish to another after they are accused of pedophilia, regardless of if they are guilty or not.

Adopting St. Alphonses Legorio’s teaching on invincible ignorance, as finding it a valid pastoral approach to omit teaching a penitent in friendship with God the awareness of an act that they are currently doing as being sinful, due to the assumption that if it is believed that the penitent would become aware that his act is a sin would still do the act and therefore formally mortally sin (because he isn’t ready to follow that rule as of yet due to immaturity in faith as of yet), could be the reason why pedophilia continues to remain systematic within the hierarchy of the Catholic Church. It could be that Bishops don’t find these priest culpable of their pedophilia acts due to the invincible ignorance that it is a sin

Documentary. Youtube it.

Understanding what 'invincible ignorance' is and how it relates to the Catholic Church's pastoral approach to pedophilia, will help the laity finally understand what goes on in the minds of these Bishops that cover-up the objectively grave sins of their priests when moving them to new parishes where the public does not know of their pedophilia actions. It is precisely because of the 'invincible ignorance' of the pedophile if in not knowing that he commits objectively grave sin when he has sex with your child, produces the circumstance for a Bishop to maintain that since the pedophile's subjective culpability is diminished if not entirely removed by 'invincible ignorance, it can be concluded that the subjective culpability of the Bishop that coverups up the objectively grave sin of the pedophile, is diminished if not entirely removed.

This arrises from a pastoral approach that ignores to inform those entrusted to their care, certain nuances or difference between subjective culpability of a sin and the objective culpability of a sin, so that it arrises that one can teach those entrusted to their care, albeit in an equivocal/ambiguous way, that a sin is not a sin, and what's not a sin is a sin.

So here we have my interpretation of what Pope Francis means to say when he says, that it is because of lack of catechesis that this coverup of pedophilia continues. But what is not considered is that although the Bishops may not be culpable for the pedophile priests' evil actions, the Bishops are still responsible according to the Principle of Double-Effect, that is, by their power and authority to take action that will reduce the bad consequences. The Bishops have a duty to try to mitigate the bad consequences as much as they can so that it can be said that the bad consequence of their pastoral approach were unintentional, that is, so that it cannot be said that the bad consequences caused the good consequences. In other words, the Bishop needs to take into account the objective evil of pedophile victims who commit suicide, the objective evils of allowing the pedophile to remain in situations that are of occasions to sin, the possibility that victims by being taught by the actions of pedophiles that evil is good and good is evil may indeed become murderers. So St.Alphonsus' pastoral approach must take into account the salvation of the souls of the pedophiles' victims as well, who by their actions implicitly teach the victims to have an inverted idea of morality.

Understanding why Bishops make decisions to move pedophiles to another parish where the public does not know of the pastors' past pedophilia activity.

Distinguishing the difference between outward visible signs of God's love for his people compared with invisible ignorant acts of grave matter against God's laws that reduce culpability entirely from subjective sin

The categories of law and their order in which it must be observed is important to understand if we are to mitigate the evil of pedophilia

correcting myself

Both philosophical freedom as well as physiological freedom constitute “deliberate consent”, and unless both are present, a person cannot be fully culpable of evil actions chosen, even if it is with full knowledge and the act is of grave matter.

part 4

Part 3

polygraph test?

period

turn off the lights when you’re done

nice memories

so to remove the bad consequences of my concealment, I will have to pray for you

A tool for good and evil

non-violantly, but enough to scare off intruders

This episode was supposed to be uploaded in Season 1 but I somehow forgot to upload it.

Bishop in charge to find pedophiles was a pedophile.

Introduction

My effort to mitigate the fear I am causing

sorry :(

burp…excuse me

Too many rules without understanding the different degree of damage it will cause if broken, will actually cause children to not tell you the truth about their abuse

What you need to know about obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and how it can be used as a litmus test for abusers to choose their victims.

as Jesus taught.

Thanks for loving me when I was at my worst ❤️